Free steam

Status
Not open for further replies.
It probably exist but is not working.. or really really private and no one will get it, but you have a really low chance of getting a free account by any keygen/bruter..

So good luck.
 
hmmm looks like it would take and EXTREMELY long time to brute a password... try it at ur own risk i'd say.. BUT then again.. if p3ng3l made it, can almost asure you it would be virus free.
 
Reflector said:
hmmm looks like it would take and EXTREMELY long time to brute a password... try it at ur own risk i'd say.. BUT then again.. if p3ng3l made it, can almost asure you it would be virus free.
Click to expand...

And thats why Windows made Virus Scanners.
Right click > Scan file for virus ;)
 
Don't you read? This program is highly private for 1 and this is an old thread. I'll ask p3ng3l and see what he says later.
 
Fail.

FreeSteam is a funny place... new programs are made to crack Steam, and Steam only.

Little do people know that there are 8 year old multipurpose brute/dictionary attackers like
Hydra, Brutus, etc. that you could easily use on auth. servers.

Btw: that video (which I saw almost a year ago), from what I can see, wouldn't work no matter what anyone on these boards tells you.

-It is obviously working very fast, it's bruteforcing which can quite literally take years over a network; word combo lists are far more effective

-He isn't using a proxy switcher... meaning he's using the same IP... meaning he can only try 10 or so passwords before his requests are denied. Brute forcing would require thousands of high-anonimity proxies (try finding 10, you probably can't)

-That app. being highly private is like keeping eggs away from someone who wants to make an omelet; they can go find eggs somewhere else.

Sorry for responding to old stuff, but I couldn't resist!
 
Deride said:
FreeSteam is a funny place... new programs are made to crack Steam, and Steam only.

Little do people know that there are 8 year old multipurpose brute/dictionary attackers like
Hydra, Brutus, etc. that you could easily use on auth. servers.

Btw: that video (which I saw almost a year ago), from what I can see, wouldn't work no matter what anyone on these boards tells you.

-It is obviously working very fast, it's bruteforcing which can quite literally take years over a network; word combo lists are far more effective

-He isn't using a proxy switcher... meaning he's using the same IP... meaning he can only try 10 or so passwords before his requests are denied. Brute forcing would require thousands of high-anonimity proxies (try finding 10, you probably can't)

-That app. being highly private is like keeping eggs away from someone who wants to make an omelet; they can go find eggs somewhere else.

Sorry for responding to old stuff, but I couldn't resist!
Click to expand...

p3ng3l ain't retarded buddy.
 
I asked him and he said:

[14:33] erix920: just to clarify
[14:33] erix920: does your account bruter work>?
[14:35] *****@googlemail.com (E-mail Address Not Verified): not rly
[14:35] erix920: becasue of the connection limit?
[14:35] *****@googlemail.com (E-mail Address Not Verified): yes
Click to expand...
 
Not to be rude, but, duh.

But my point was that there are already five or so stable apps. that actually do work for that sort of thing. To use them properly, some knowledge of basic HTTP authentication and advanced HTTP GET is necessary.

Can someone lock this please?
 
Well, it's not an easy thing to program. I'm sure I could do it but I stopped programming so that wont work. If you want to go ahead and make it i'm sure I could write some small functions.
 
Status
Not open for further replies.
Back
Top